Search found 195 matches
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:47 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
I'm going to solicit Jim's opinion on that one. I think it looks a lot better - no gaps between the threads that I can see, but the wavery bits around the edges might be just a hair of overextrusion. One last adjustment and print - change the Z-Offset to -0.24 mm and print one more. (It's so close ...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:25 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
I'm going to solicit Jim's opinion on that one. I think it looks a lot better - no gaps between the threads that I can see, but the wavery bits around the edges might be just a hair of overextrusion. One last adjustment and print - change the Z-Offset to -0.24 mm and print one more. (It's so close ...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:09 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
I will note that both the .20 and .25 feel smooth to the touch on the bottom (vs the top where you feel the infill)...despite the look of the threads...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:07 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
Have you ever done an extrusion width calibration? Usually, if the height of the square is exactly 2.0 mm, you will get a more filled-in first layer. Hate to tell you to change the Z-Offset again, but try changing the Z-Offset number to -0.25 mm and run one more square, then take a picture of the b...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:41 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
Have you ever done an extrusion width calibration? Usually, if the height of the square is exactly 2.0 mm, you will get a more filled-in first layer. Hate to tell you to change the Z-Offset again, but try changing the Z-Offset number to -0.25 mm and run one more square, then take a picture of the b...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:33 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
yes still too far away. move it about .05mm closer and try again Yes but if I do, then the height of my calibration square will be off... Maybe I should adjust the bolt and use a .1 or .06 feeler gauge instead of the .15? Also, when I set the Z via the bolt, I'm doing it with both the bed and the e...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:31 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
Yes, 40mm manualJules wrote:Hmmmmn - that still shows that the bed is a little too far away. (Much better than it was, but there is still some under-extrusion.)
Let me ask you another question - what extrusion width did you set? (0.40 mm?)
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:51 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
....btw going back to -20 gets me back to the correct height...but I notice the lines in the bottom of the calibration square...maybe there is an infill setting I should be playing with?? Post a closeup picture of the bottom of the last square, let's take a look...... Here it is!! Is this bad? It's...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 2:31 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
yes. nothing wrong with doing it in software the way jules does it as long as that work for you. i just could never remember what was the correct offset when switching between profiles. I had to set up and save separate profiles for each filament, otherwise I'd have forgotten by the next day. (On t...
- Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:58 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Stringy bottom
- Replies: 51
- Views: 44449
Re: Stringy bottom
Okay, silly question...What is half a flat? Is that a half turn of the bolt?