Z-stop and Extruder Gremlins
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2016 6:23 am
Just curious if anyone else has seen some of the general weirdness I've been seeing the last couple of days.
Had, yet another, extruder jam. So I cleared the jam, no problem. I had a spare nozzle, though to be fully "transparent", it was a used nozzle from a different but same rev. extruder (V4), and put that nozzle on the extruder that I cleaned up. Maybe all my issues can be traced to threading this used nozzle to a different extruder that it had spent most of its time on.
So in no particular order, here's my list of oddness:
1. The z-stop magically had changed after re-assembly. Its possible the nozzle is .16 mm taller than the one it replaced, but I was previously using a g-code z-offset in S3D to get my regulation 2 mm tall calibration square, but even after setting the z-offset to zero, post jam clearing, I was still .03 mm 'too tall.' This was after doing the same gap-setting method recommended for the V4 (ie. zero the bed, feeler gauge between nozzle and bed, tighten extruder clamp bolt).
2. Maybe there is operator error with my feeler gauges, but after my first extruder jam, the extruder was snug, but not loose, I home Z, with .15mm gauge between nozzle and bed, tightened the extruder clamp bolt, ran my calibration square, and was nearly .10mm too tall. After my most recent extruder jam, I compromised and used .10mm gauge, and "wait for it!" yup, was .05mm too tall on the first calibration square.
3. The used nozzle may have been damaged after the first jam. Though I did not use any mechanical methods to clearing the jam on the nozzle, e.g. solvents only. Running calibration squares, and doing the extrusion math, .40 mm/ 'measured mm' wall thickness * .90 yields extrusion multipliers that are .05 bigger than the number I enter in my S3D profile that gets me close. Its also possible that my set-up is in that weird place where it doesn't matter what my configuration is, I'm going to get .43 mm walls, but I have only two data points, so don't have definitive evidence.
I have a 100 hours +/- on my printer, so its not like I've been running the machine 24x7 for a year and all my components are worn and tired.
Had, yet another, extruder jam. So I cleared the jam, no problem. I had a spare nozzle, though to be fully "transparent", it was a used nozzle from a different but same rev. extruder (V4), and put that nozzle on the extruder that I cleaned up. Maybe all my issues can be traced to threading this used nozzle to a different extruder that it had spent most of its time on.
So in no particular order, here's my list of oddness:
1. The z-stop magically had changed after re-assembly. Its possible the nozzle is .16 mm taller than the one it replaced, but I was previously using a g-code z-offset in S3D to get my regulation 2 mm tall calibration square, but even after setting the z-offset to zero, post jam clearing, I was still .03 mm 'too tall.' This was after doing the same gap-setting method recommended for the V4 (ie. zero the bed, feeler gauge between nozzle and bed, tighten extruder clamp bolt).
2. Maybe there is operator error with my feeler gauges, but after my first extruder jam, the extruder was snug, but not loose, I home Z, with .15mm gauge between nozzle and bed, tightened the extruder clamp bolt, ran my calibration square, and was nearly .10mm too tall. After my most recent extruder jam, I compromised and used .10mm gauge, and "wait for it!" yup, was .05mm too tall on the first calibration square.
3. The used nozzle may have been damaged after the first jam. Though I did not use any mechanical methods to clearing the jam on the nozzle, e.g. solvents only. Running calibration squares, and doing the extrusion math, .40 mm/ 'measured mm' wall thickness * .90 yields extrusion multipliers that are .05 bigger than the number I enter in my S3D profile that gets me close. Its also possible that my set-up is in that weird place where it doesn't matter what my configuration is, I'm going to get .43 mm walls, but I have only two data points, so don't have definitive evidence.
I have a 100 hours +/- on my printer, so its not like I've been running the machine 24x7 for a year and all my components are worn and tired.